Re: [HACKERS] ginInsertCleanup called from vacuum could still miss tuples to be deleted

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ginInsertCleanup called from vacuum could still miss tuples to be deleted
Date: 2017-11-16 20:54:07
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzkqyx3zLrwew6H5ccOuJAi2t-V3DwgS=CtzcpBgRL+_xg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> But there is only ever one page locked, the meta-page. And, it's
> always an ExclusiveLock. I don't see much use for deadlock avoidance.

I meant deadlock detection.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-11-16 21:25:03 Re: Rewriting PL/Python's typeio code
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-11-16 20:49:21 Re: [HACKERS] ginInsertCleanup called from vacuum could still miss tuples to be deleted