Re: Making C function declaration parameter names consistent with corresponding definition names

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Making C function declaration parameter names consistent with corresponding definition names
Date: 2022-09-20 06:36:35
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzkn0W2SFtdPk1pFZUPF9vZy82X6D85YTVt2qq3w7hRJug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 9:17 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> Will fix all those in the next revision. Thanks.

Attached revision v4 fixes those pg_dump patch items.

It also breaks out the ecpg changes into their own patch. Looks like
ecpg requires the same treatment as the timezone code and the regex
code -- it generally doesn't use named parameters in function
declarations, so the majority of its function declarations need to be
adjusted. The overall code churn impact is higher than it was with the
other two modules.

--
Peter Geoghegan

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0002-Harmonize-parameter-names-in-jsonb-code.patch application/octet-stream 12.1 KB
v4-0004-Harmonize-parameter-names-in-miscellaneous-code.patch application/octet-stream 113.3 KB
v4-0003-Harmonize-parameter-names-in-ecpg-code.patch application/octet-stream 37.1 KB
v4-0001-Harmonize-parameter-names-in-pg_dump-pg_dumpall.patch application/octet-stream 56.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2022-09-20 06:40:55 Re: missing indexes in indexlist with partitioned tables
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2022-09-20 06:35:51 Re: Proposal to use JSON for Postgres Parser format