Re: are there any expectations about pg indexes having prefix compression?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Alexandre hadjinlian guerra <alexhguerra(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: are there any expectations about pg indexes having prefix compression?
Date: 2019-07-08 00:27:16
Message-ID: CAH2-WzkiodWMj_BUm=MQ8SaZ=czWOAMK3d0TXV4Rs3oZw-a3BQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 10:35 PM Alexandre hadjinlian guerra
<alexhguerra(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> i cant find any info about PG using btree prefix compression or dictionary based compression. May i ask the status for these features?

Optional prefix compression would make sense, but there are currently
no active plans to add on it that I'm aware of.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Achilleas Mantzios 2019-07-08 06:19:44 Re: pgsql 8.3 : force FK (and consequently ON DELETE CASCADE) to be run under session_replication_role TO 'replica'
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2019-07-07 17:36:39 Re: When it's really necessary to enable WAR archiving in case of low level backups?