| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Reducing the runtime of the core regression tests |
| Date: | 2019-04-12 16:48:06 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WzkigVi4996YWPsF4PrEwDfzuyJtvyKZjWPg_9ej_1o3Aw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 9:31 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Done. Do you have a preferred spot where the counts were wrong?
Not really, but I can give you an example.
Line counts for each of the two "break" statements within
_bt_keep_natts_fast() are exactly the same. I don't think that this
because we actually hit each break exactly the same number of times
(90,236 times). I think that we see this because the same instruction
is associated with both break statements in the loop. All of the
examples I've noticed are a bit like that. Not a huge problem, but
less useful than the alternative.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John W Higgins | 2019-04-12 17:15:47 | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-04-12 16:46:56 | Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page |