Re: Triage on old commitfest entries

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Triage on old commitfest entries
Date: 2021-10-05 04:51:56
Message-ID: CAH2-WzkeiTPqMau+8Jt1=QgCA5yfQnxFftNMc3g5mUBe3Y-u4Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 7:45 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> It sounds like Peter is willing to take point on the executor end
> of things (b-tree in particular). If he can explain what a reasonable
> cost model would look like, I'm willing to see about making that happen
> in the planner.

I would be happy to work with you on this. It's clearly an important project.

Having you involved with the core planner aspects (as well as general
design questions) significantly derisks everything. That's *very*
valuable to me.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Nancarrow 2021-10-05 05:40:34 Re: Added schema level support for publication.
Previous Message Noah Misch 2021-10-05 04:34:38 Re: Role Self-Administration