| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Teaching users how they can get the most out of HOT in Postgres 14 |
| Date: | 2021-06-18 02:27:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WzkdQr_R1B3=w3JgzZBRceqZWyPRC6fRd_CN_Yf4Xow16Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 5:55 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> (Various sgml typos)
Fixed in the v3 I just posted.
> + removed until index cleanup is completed. This option has no
> + effect for tables that do not have an index and is ignored if
> + the <literal>FULL</literal> option is used.
>
> I'd say "tables that have no indexes,"
That wording wasn't mine (it just happened to be moved around by
reformatting), but I think you're right. I went with your suggestion.
Thanks for taking a look
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com | 2021-06-18 02:40:48 | RE: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-06-18 02:26:07 | Re: Teaching users how they can get the most out of HOT in Postgres 14 |