Re: DBT-5 Stored Procedure Development (2022)

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Mahesh Gouru <mahesh(dot)gouru(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DBT-5 Stored Procedure Development (2022)
Date: 2022-04-19 18:07:14
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzkd=eTjONRTnapq6quoM7Q+i+ciUkvXMiTvrDVmrt8v2w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 11:02 AM Mahesh Gouru <mahesh(dot)gouru(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Please review the attached for my jerry-rigged project proposal. I am seeking to continually refactor the proposal as I can!

I for one see a lot of value in this proposal. I think it would be
great to revive DBT-5, since TPC-E has a number of interesting
bottlenecks that we'd likely learn something from. It's particularly
good at stressing concurrency control, which TPC-C really doesn't do.
It's also a lot easier to run smaller benchmarks that don't require
lots of storage space, but are nevertheless correct according to the
spec.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-04-19 18:29:06 Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
Previous Message Erik Rijkers 2022-04-19 18:02:24 Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("tabstat->trans == trans", File: "pgstat_relation.c", Line: 508