On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 5:17 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in replying. We do get questions about the btree
> length limit occasionally, but practically the length limit usually
> isn't a problem.
Technically the limitation is documented elsewhere, since it is a
limitation of the B-Tree access method specifically. However, I think
that there is a good practical argument to be made for including it
here as well.
--
Peter Geoghegan