Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?
Date: 2019-03-05 00:14:40
Message-ID: CAH2-WzkauoNo3TmWjWwTHRZPVaw1=VB51E8W3BRm5Zx4AVEByw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:48 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> +1 for raising the default substantially. In my experience, and it
> seems others are in a similar place, nobody ever gets into trouble
> because the default is too high, but sometimes people get in trouble
> because the default is too low.

Does anyone want to make an argument against the idea of raising the
default? They should speak up now.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2019-03-05 00:16:42 Re: POC: converting Lists into arrays
Previous Message David Rowley 2019-03-04 23:58:31 Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT