Re: A qsort template

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A qsort template
Date: 2022-05-19 22:24:05
Message-ID: CAH2-WzkNY8F0WNXkUUKPVS_Dh0LDiYOHmuh1sbuAX2DK0nBBTg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 1:12 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> Should these debug lines be removed ?
>
> elog(DEBUG1, "qsort_tuple");

I agree -- DEBUG1 seems too chatty for something like this. DEBUG2
would be more appropriate IMV. Though I don't feel very strongly about
it.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-05-19 22:43:41 Re: A qsort template
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-05-19 21:16:03 Re: pg15b1: FailedAssertion("val > base", File: "...src/include/utils/relptr.h", Line: 67, PID: 30485)