Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
Date: 2022-08-04 18:08:46
Message-ID: CAH2-WzkN5HvtQ3dpAf8bWmGc1pYehUtyt1FwMZAQuEad7oaWwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 11:07 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> How much will that add to the test's runtime? I could get behind this
> idea if it's not exorbitantly expensive.

I'm not sure offhand, but I suspect it wouldn't be too bad.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2022-08-04 18:19:28 Re: [PATCH] CF app: add "Returned: Needs more interest"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-08-04 18:07:45 Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade