Re: Optimising compactify_tuples()

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jakub Wartak <Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Optimising compactify_tuples()
Date: 2020-09-16 02:09:43
Message-ID: CAH2-WzkLyoWNFqqfJWJzOY4toU6ba+oas399zXuc3VaTQhfoAA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 7:01 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 1:30 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I also did some further performance tests of something other than
> > recovery. I can also report a good performance improvement in VACUUM.
> > Something around the ~25% reduction mark
>
> Wonderful results. It must be rare for a such a localised patch to
> have such a large effect on such common workloads.

Yes, that's terrific.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2020-09-16 02:10:17 Re: pg_restore causing deadlocks on partitioned tables
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2020-09-16 02:01:21 Re: Optimising compactify_tuples()