| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound |
| Date: | 2023-10-04 12:07:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WzkDEv+0Bu8VYEiiomYMeaJ1X3D2dz57C1Zy13JrQ_vuBg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 1:25 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm also pretty happy with these patches and would like to see at
> least 0001 and 0002 committed, and probably 0003 as well. I am,
> however, -1 on back-patching. Perhaps that is overly cautious, but I
> don't like changing existing messages in back-branches. It will break
> translations, and potentially monitoring scripts, etc.
>
> If John's not available to take this forward, I can volunteer as
> substitute committer, unless Peter or Peter would like to handle it.
If you're willing to take over as committer here, I'll let the issue
of backpatching go.
I only ask that you note why you've not backpatched in the commit message.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2023-10-04 12:16:33 | Re: Eager page freeze criteria clarification |
| Previous Message | Drouvot, Bertrand | 2023-10-04 12:04:13 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |