| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
| Date: | 2018-04-05 21:13:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WzkDD99u8yx6ie6M6rRrrpv2FfnhDqy2BgNvXBmuxXcWag@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Perhaps I am missing something but there has been a lot of public discussion
> on this feature for the last 7 weeks of which you barely participated. I
> certainly understand wanting some notice before commit but there has been
> lots of discussion, multiple people publicly commenting on the patch and
> Magnus has been very receptive to all feedback (that I have seen). Perhaps
> we are being a sensitive because of another patch that is actually
> ramrodding the process and we need to take a step back?
I wish it was just one patch. I can think of several.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-04-05 21:16:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Optional message to user when terminating/cancelling backend |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2018-04-05 21:13:45 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |