| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Pengchengliu <pengchengliu(at)tju(dot)edu(dot)cn>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: suboverflowed subtransactions concurrency performance optimize |
| Date: | 2022-05-27 19:30:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WzkCONe3BVM22TnGRmGLmRuJN9=p8tTgLCPAbnQU1WA+xw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 11:59 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2022-05-27 11:48:45 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > I find it hard to believe that there wasn't even a cursory effort at
> > performance validation before this was committed, but that's what it
> > looks like.
>
> Yea. Imo this pretty clearly should be reverted. It has correctness issues,
> testing issues and we don't know whether it does anything useful.
It should definitely be reverted.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-05-27 19:44:44 | Re: "ERROR: latch already owned" on gharial |
| Previous Message | Cary Huang | 2022-05-27 19:08:51 | Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name |