Re: Suppressing noise in successful check-world runs

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suppressing noise in successful check-world runs
Date: 2019-05-24 19:31:09
Message-ID: CAH2-WzkAmMm8p5XEjhRTbaZSex53zvZhim7b5cg8WfPNCkip7A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 3:57 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I experimented with the attached quick-hack patch to make pg_regress
> suppress notices from its various initial DROP/CREATE IF [NOT] EXISTS
> commands. I'm not entirely convinced whether suppressing them is
> a good idea though. Perhaps some hack with effects confined to
> pg_upgrade's test would be better. I don't have a good idea what
> that would look like, however.
>
> Or we could just say this isn't annoying enough to fix.

I think it's worth fixing.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-05-24 19:50:02 Re: Suppressing noise in successful check-world runs
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2019-05-24 19:30:41 Re: BUG #15781: subselect on foreign table (postgres_fdw) can crash (segfault)