From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Disk-based hash aggregate's cost model |
Date: | 2020-08-28 00:28:20 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzk1-JiW2heHg8LqJzV5Q4VtOBj7QDXTESd_o0Vzo+_Etw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
We have a Postgres 13 open item for Disk-based hash aggregate, which
is the only non-trivial open item. There is a general concern about
how often we get disk-based hash aggregation when work_mem is
particularly low, and recursion seems unavoidable. This is generally
thought to be a problem in the costing.
Tomas Vondra did some testing of the patch which led to discussion of
this on the hash agg GUC megathread, here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200724012248.y77rpqc73agrsvb3@development
I am starting this new thread to deal with the open item.
Any progress on this, Jeff? Please correct or expand on my summary of
the open item if I got something wrong.
Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2020-08-28 00:30:23 | New default role- 'pg_read_all_data' |
Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2020-08-28 00:22:47 | [PATCH] Explicit null dereferenced (src/backend/access/heap/heaptoast.c) |