| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hans Buschmann <buschmann(at)nidsa(dot)net>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: AW: AW: BUG #18147: ERROR: invalid perminfoindex 0 in RTE with relid xxxxx |
| Date: | 2023-10-23 19:01:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzk=D3X3fKPeg-u1VirLOKU64xcjSnqyuStiFw2kYJuuGw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:55 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Yeah, there are comments within index_unchanged_by_update about those
> things. What I'm unhappy about is that indexam.sgml's discussion of
> the indexUnchanged flag makes it sound far more trustworthy than it
> actually is. Somebody who just read that doco and didn't scour the
> underlying code would be badly misled.
I understand. I'll come up with a doc patch for that later on today.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | shihao zhong | 2023-10-23 20:58:44 | Re: BUG #17969: Assert failed in bloom_init() when false_positive_rate = 0.25 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-10-23 18:55:08 | Re: AW: AW: BUG #18147: ERROR: invalid perminfoindex 0 in RTE with relid xxxxx |