From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Showing primitive index scan count in EXPLAIN ANALYZE (for skip scan and SAOP scans) |
Date: | 2025-03-01 22:39:56 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=zzD+752xD8NjVfdxh6c_vRdhWhwRHSw4qXOt=quk=vg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 7:57 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 3:42 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Good documentation could help.
Attached revision adds an example that shows how "Index Searches: N"
can vary. This appears in "14.1.2. EXPLAIN ANALYZE".
Other changes in this revision:
* Improved commit message.
* We now consistently show "Index Searches: N" after all other scan
related output, so that it will reliably appear immediately before the
"Buffers: " line.
This seemed slightly better, since it is often useful to consider
these two numbers together.
My current plan is to commit this patch on Wednesday or Thursday,
barring any objections.
Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Show-index-search-count-in-EXPLAIN-ANALYZE.patch | application/octet-stream | 55.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-03-01 23:54:21 | Re: bug when apply fast default mechanism for adding new column over domain with default value |
Previous Message | Ed Behn | 2025-03-01 22:25:19 | Re: access numeric data in module |