| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new heapcheck contrib module |
| Date: | 2020-10-22 21:45:43 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=y5KnCUzqkuxpQg60+-LgfPgPNajz=rKV-nXHmE4FNmQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:39 PM Mark Dilger
<mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > This is great work. Thanks Mark and Robert.
>
> That's the first time I've laughed today. Having turned the build-farm red, this is quite ironic feedback! Thanks all the same for the sentiment.
Breaking the buildfarm is not a capital offense. Especially when it
happens with patches that are in some sense low level and/or novel,
and therefore inherently more likely to cause trouble.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-10-22 22:15:46 | Re: new heapcheck contrib module |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-10-22 21:45:05 | Re: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist |