| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 |
| Date: | 2018-03-24 17:19:33 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=xYGcOOXYr8fhbJE_FtP48DZ7o-mV_0jrdFtGJ+2rZGg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:52 PM, Pavan Deolasee
<pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> A quick gdb tracing shows that the CTE itself is assigned plan_id 1 and the
> SubPlan then gets plan_id 2. I can investigate further, but given that we
> see a similar behaviour with regular UPDATE, I don't think it's worth.
Clearly I jumped the gun on this one. I agree that this is fine.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-03-24 17:25:34 | Undesirable entries in typedefs list |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-03-24 17:10:19 | Re: Backend memory dump analysis |