From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: First-draft release notes for next week's releases |
Date: | 2019-02-10 18:24:18 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=v49sm5zJ86fxipKVM8MNS7ir_=YLSHMaG7LcHm4rC2A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 10:05 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 6:00 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The v10 release notes just say
>
> Reduce page locking during vacuuming of <acronym>GIN</acronym> indexes
> (Andrey Borodin)
>
> so it doesn't seem like there's any difference at that level of detail.
> But I'll expand the new release note, say
>
> This change partially reverts a performance improvement, introduced
> in version 10, that attempted to reduce the number of index pages
> locked during deletion of a GIN posting tree page. That's now been
> found to lead to deadlocks, so we've removed it pending closer
> analysis.
That plan seems sensible to me. The wording looks good, too.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2019-02-10 19:30:57 | Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-02-10 18:22:37 | Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages) |