Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyle Kingsbury <aphyr(at)jepsen(dot)io>, Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>
Subject: Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation
Date: 2020-06-11 17:56:58
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=tO7xnw9-ifnN-=kHHbQohZ_SXMoqLjBNxhKkbcx4Rbg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:13 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It's only comments, but it'd still be good to get some review since
> it's essentially describing the relevant contract. Here's what I came
> up with.

LGTM.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-06-11 19:30:23 Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-06-11 17:12:02 Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation