Re: pgsql: Drop index behind pg_upgrade test issue.

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Drop index behind pg_upgrade test issue.
Date: 2021-03-11 20:55:45
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=sHosDyXmnk4bNdaT5trO1uEty1TvbZXB9VtrBQtNJrg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 1:36 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> I'd take that as an indication that Michael had a point with his
> complaint[1]. Perhaps it would be better to implement one of his
> ideas than to remove the test.

The Postgres 11 and 12 "drop index" commits are now reverted.

Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-03-11 21:47:49 Re: pgsql: Don't consider newly inserted tuples in nbtree VACUUM.
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-03-11 20:55:26 pgsql: Restore vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor coverage.