| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ON CONFLICT with constraint name doesn't work |
| Date: | 2017-03-16 19:51:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=o5eMFH20Yw2h9hrn0TxkGZpM0zq1Uw9xoWjMPP9CDEg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> FWIW, I never was completely on board with this design goal, and I think
> we should have (and still should) support using indexes directly.
FWIW I agree that we probably should have exposed indexes as a target
that can be named directly, while still generally discouraging the
practice. But, it hardly matters now.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 2017-03-16 20:08:53 | Re: ON CONFLICT with constraint name doesn't work |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-03-16 19:49:08 | Re: ON CONFLICT with constraint name doesn't work |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-16 20:07:34 | Re: Parallel Append implementation |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-03-16 19:49:08 | Re: ON CONFLICT with constraint name doesn't work |