Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyle Kingsbury <aphyr(at)jepsen(dot)io>
Subject: Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation
Date: 2020-06-09 02:30:15
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=n7P5S_+mJHaZa4EP3qM9CGidSvocy38hm+TLvhWp1-A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 7:17 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> This should be testable with isolationtester, right?

I'll try to write an isolationtester test tomorrow.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2020-06-09 02:54:51 Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-06-09 02:17:06 Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation