From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname |
Date: | 2021-10-12 16:44:25 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=hfpcf5zBr4K3MOsqi2nWsKuLyHRpZpzFYanRP3mGHSw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 7:41 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Oh, give me a break. The previous behavior obviously hasn't been
> tested either, and is broken on its face. If someone *had* complained
> about it, I imagine you would have promptly fixed it and likely
> back-patched the fix, probably in under 24 hours from the time of the
> report.
You're asking us to imagine a counterfactual. But this counterfactual
bug report would have to describe a real practical problem. The
details would matter. It's reasonable to suppose that we haven't seen
such a bug report for a reason.
I can't speak for Tom. My position on this is that it's better to
leave it alone at this time, given the history, and the lack of
complaints from users.
> I find it difficult to take seriously the contention that
> anyone is expecting \d dlsgjdsghj.sdhg.l.dsg.jkhsdg.foo.bar to work
> like \d foo.bar, or that they would even prefer that behavior over an
> error message. You're carefully avoiding addressing that question in
> favor of having a discussion of backward compatibility, but a better
> term for what we're talking about here would be bug-compatibility.
Let's assume that it is bug compatibility. Is that intrinsically a bad thing?
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2021-10-12 16:52:30 | Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2021-10-12 16:15:41 | Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson |