Re: Guidelines on dropping objects in regression tests, sqlsmith

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de
Subject: Re: Guidelines on dropping objects in regression tests, sqlsmith
Date: 2018-04-15 03:28:07
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=ZxbjFykyYOExWcspfZk+BRHgFZ2a-xA0Y8hHfK_A8xw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 8:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> So we've got *some*, but it sure looks like they were all added by the
> patch to fix covering indexes for partitions. I'd want to see some for
> plain-table cases as well.

Will do.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergei Kornilov 2018-04-15 07:09:11 Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-04-15 03:02:09 Re: Guidelines on dropping objects in regression tests, sqlsmith