Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops
Date: 2022-01-13 00:19:45
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=Wv+Pb_ifi32Ut2NsmXZuoxRcd5TWApq4eEG4ijaYD1w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 4:13 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think that's a reasonable request. I'm not sure that I believe it's
> 100% necessary, but it's certainly an improvement on a technical
> level, and given that the proposed change could impact quite a lot of
> plans, it's fair to want to see some effort being put into mitigating
> the possible downsides. Now, I'm not sure when I might have time to
> actually try to do the work, which kind of sucks, but that's how it
> goes sometimes.

Should I take it that you've dropped this project? I was rather hoping
that you'd get back to it, FWIW.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-01-13 00:34:42 Re: Stream replication test fails of cfbot/windows server 2019
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-01-12 23:58:26 Re: Windows vs recovery tests