Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?
Date: 2019-02-25 06:17:09
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=WQ9ju6sjPF7RcW0g6NPXAenZeC5qVme6uj+eMRw5q2g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 9:42 PM David Rowley
<david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> The current default vacuum_cost_limit of 200 seems to be 15 years old
> and was added in f425b605f4e.
>
> Any supporters for raising the default?

I also think that the current default limit is far too conservative.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Imai, Yoshikazu 2019-02-25 06:24:11 RE: speeding up planning with partitions
Previous Message David Rowley 2019-02-25 05:42:12 Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?