| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Combine Prune and Freeze records emitted by vacuum |
| Date: | 2024-03-20 20:10:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=VXgNu1wdTBMMN1GcoJ9SfZM5khA0ip8zuHGweKufBcg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 4:06 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > What about the issue of cleanup locks, which aren't needed and aren't
> > taken with the current heapam VACUUM record type? Will you preserve
> > that aspect of the existing design?
>
> Yep, we have a flag to indicate whether or not a cleanup lock is needed.
Thanks for confirming.
I realize that this is fairly obvious, but thought it better to ask.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2024-03-20 20:14:23 | Trying to build x86 version on windows using meson |
| Previous Message | Melanie Plageman | 2024-03-20 20:06:13 | Re: Combine Prune and Freeze records emitted by vacuum |