From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights |
Date: | 2019-05-18 01:47:37 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=S+viOhuQVXLGCCPTj3+fsNReN85BJmjERYgXYQoUt0Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 6:39 PM David Rowley
<david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> FWIW, I do think the release notes should be meant as a source of
> information which give a brief view on changes made that have a
> reasonable possibility of affecting people (either negative or
> positively) who are upgrading. Leaving out important details because
> they might confuse a small group of people seems wrong-headed
If the only thing that comes out of the developer meeting discussion
item on release notes is that we make the commits behind each listing
*discoverable* from the web, then that will still be a big
improvement. I would prefer it if we went further, but that seems like
it solves a lot of problems without creating new ones.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2019-05-18 02:30:17 | Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2019-05-18 01:38:49 | Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-05-18 02:20:00 | Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2019-05-18 01:38:49 | Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights |