Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Date: 2021-05-18 16:01:44
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=OekjrDeMx3u=FZBGUKwkLfRZ080qbv399BXpJbx56VQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

We do retain the reloption, but ignore it. Purely to avoid the dump and
reload hazard. I think that you could reasonably tell users that it's gone
completely, because it does nothing on either 13 or 14. It's hidden from
them to the extent that that's possible.

Peter Geoghegan
(Sent from my phone)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2021-05-18 17:02:20 Re: seawasp failing, maybe in glibc allocator
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2021-05-18 15:57:11 Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft