Re: Making C function declaration parameter names consistent with corresponding definition names

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Making C function declaration parameter names consistent with corresponding definition names
Date: 2022-09-17 23:55:17
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=NXRvZ6bpxdjSy5CUZbeqS0SB_9tDs8FJ6Z08gHpGfZQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 11:59 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> If check_usermap() is used in a bugfix, that could be a risk, so this
> bit warrants a backpatch in my opinion.

Makes sense. Committed and backpatched a fix for check_usermap() just now

Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2022-09-18 02:08:28 Re: Refactor backup related code (was: Is it correct to say, "invalid data in file \"%s\"", BACKUP_LABEL_FILE in do_pg_backup_stop?)
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2022-09-17 21:54:27 Re: remove more archiving overhead