Re: Prepared statements assume text type in PG10

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Jack Christensen <jack(at)jackchristensen(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Prepared statements assume text type in PG10
Date: 2017-10-07 23:31:27
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=ECN7Z_ZfpOU8GfSzQi9Sx6Kt4P5y4DMphR6+BLn2Uvw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> I suspect commit d8d32d9 is involved here, though I haven't verified that.

Weirdly, there is a git hash collision here, so you'll have to put in
d8d32d9a (8 characters -- the default of 7 for a short git hash isn't
cutting it).

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-10-08 00:23:09 Re: Prepared statements assume text type in PG10
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-10-07 23:27:51 Re: Prepared statements assume text type in PG10