| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Pg_upgrade and collation |
| Date: | 2016-07-09 21:48:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=DBwOZuEfWik1YyNxsCwHFnyKZtGYf0RJJ+7HK62oX8g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 6/28/16 5:58 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>>
>> I have long advocated adopting ICU as our defacto standard "collation
>> provider", primarily so that we can directly control collations and
>> collation versioning. I think that doing this would solve many
>> problems.
>
>
> I plan to submit a patch for ICU support for September.
That's fantastic news! Your knowledge of packaging will be useful
here. I will review your patch.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Law | 2016-07-11 16:57:31 | A typo in fdwhandler.sgml |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-07-09 14:02:24 | Re: Pg_upgrade and collation |