Re: Logical replication in the same cluster

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical replication in the same cluster
Date: 2017-05-01 19:04:13
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=CW63zobcHyJGMw9kBdBEmLOskQrM39eK1gD_9=KTr7g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> What exactly are you proposing to do? You mean catching errors in the
> creating backend, if it didn't crash?

That is what I meant, though I'm not actually proposing to do anything.

> That doesn't strike me as a good
> idea, because it'll push down the likelihood of the issue below where
> people will see it, but it'll still be likely enough for it to create
> problems.

I was concerned about that too. I have a hard time defending changes
like this to myself, but it doesn't hurt to ask.

--
Peter Geoghegan

VMware vCenter Server
https://www.vmware.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-05-01 19:10:32 Re: [buildfarm-members] BuildFarm client release 4.19
Previous Message Mikael Kjellström 2017-05-01 19:00:38 Re: [buildfarm-members] BuildFarm client release 4.19