Re: BTScanOpaqueData size slows down tests

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BTScanOpaqueData size slows down tests
Date: 2025-04-02 16:45:37
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=8xV+BpT6F6xhDYAVr4=OvK1u5BSqUWB3vOt5ZLqBb-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 12:43 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> I'm just saying that this is the reason to have the field be last in the
> struct.

Right. And I'm just saying that I don't think that it would take very
much effort to change it. That aspect isn't performance critical.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2025-04-02 16:49:33 Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for GIN indexes
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-04-02 16:43:46 Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for GIN indexes