Re: WAL insert delay settings

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL insert delay settings
Date: 2019-02-14 08:53:54
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=6v8UCfF5PoERBqvjJY9Wu8GJm1Ufsr8MaGg2=Y_Sk3A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 12:52 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> I imagine that it held the critical locks briefly.

I didn't mention that the utility they used would send SIGSTOP and
SIGCONT in close succession. (Yeah, I know.)

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-02-14 09:00:13 Re: WAL insert delay settings
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-02-14 08:52:17 Re: WAL insert delay settings