Re: [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Alik Khilazhev <a(dot)khilazhev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench
Date: 2017-07-13 17:02:09
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=6e7udS0y0WpdNw4nUFXjkz7LCKAN0DCvRwsn7E66_7g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:38 AM, Alik Khilazhev
<a(dot)khilazhev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> I am attaching results of test for 32 and 128 clients for original and
> patched(_bt_doinsert) variants.

Thanks.

The number of leaf pages at the left hand side of the leaf level seems
to be ~50 less than the unpatched 128 client case was the first time
around, which seems like a significant difference. I wonder why. Maybe
autovacuum ran at the right/wrong time this time around?

Did you happen to record TPS for this most recent set of tests?

I notice one possibly interesting thing from these new numbers: the 32
client case is slightly more bloated when unique index enforcement is
removed.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-07-13 17:04:02 Re: PostgreSQL - Weak DH group
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-07-13 17:00:18 Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows