Re: amcheck packages

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:
> Re: To Peter Geoghegan 2017-10-02 <20171002073842(dot)yzp5i2xcihmj62co(at)msg(dot)df7cb(dot)de>
>> Re: Peter Geoghegan 2017-10-01 <CAH2-WznDdnsQ2=VzvrvkSKrLBOrJE9t-EciDUKdQpPsUq72yrQ(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
>> > I can push a temporary branch to Github, for your review. Does that
>> > work for you?
>>
>> I can point Jenkins at branches/tags for building, no problem.
>
> I just discovered the branch you pushed and had a look. The changelog
> timestamp is now valid, but your email address is invalid (pg(at)marmot),
> which dpkg doesn't like at all :(
>
>> > > Also, if you want to build Debian packages from git repo's HEAD, it is
>> > > often easier to set debian/source/format to "1.0" which will disable
>> > > the "there are changes neither in the tarball nor in debian/patches"
>> > > check.
>
> If you fix the changelog, and put plain "1.0" (no qualifier) into
> debian/source/format, we should be good to go.

I pushed a version that makes those changes. Please let me know what
you think, particularly about the versioning style (package version
vs. extension version).

--
Peter Geoghegan