Re: Weird problem that enormous locks

From: Tony Wang <wwwjfy(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Weird problem that enormous locks
Date: 2011-07-15 00:01:47
Message-ID: CAH1z_A44Q7kgYSDtmF3RMJbRGUhD-ODbKh_yG_-zz9oLnCConw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 01:13, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Tony Wang <wwwjfy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:35, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > It's a game server, and the queries are updating users' money, as normal.
> > The sql is like "UPDATE player SET money = money + 100 where id = 12345".
> > The locks were RowExclusiveLock for the table "player" and the indexes.
> The
> > weird thing is there was another ExclusiveLock for the table "player",
> i.e.
> > "player" got two locks, one RowExclusiveLock and one ExclusiveLock.
> > In the postgresql documentation
> > (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/explicit-locking.html) it's
> said
> > about the Exclusive "This lock mode is not automatically acquired on
> user
> > tables by any PostgreSQL command."
>
> You need to figure out what part of your app, or maybe a rogue
> developer etc is throwing an exclusive lock.
>

Yeah, that's what I'm trying to do

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2011-07-15 00:22:00 Re: Weird problem that enormous locks
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2011-07-14 17:13:01 Re: Weird problem that enormous locks