Re: psycopg3 transactions

From: Daniel Fortunov <postgresql(at)danielfortunov(dot)com>
To: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Paolo De Stefani <paolo(at)paolodestefani(dot)it>, Psycopg <psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psycopg3 transactions
Date: 2021-10-13 23:28:11
Message-ID: CAH1rg6ZoQm=STwMR6AQ_FggxRxUn7qH_tLkRTfJTVYYdbTeL6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: psycopg

On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 20:06, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

>
> I think we can improve the documentation there by extending more about
> the effects of the interaction between DBAPI transactions and the
> transaction() blocks. And things are definitely more intuitive if
> transaction() is used in autocommit: we might want to advise people to
> do that.
>

Agree. The DBAPI choice to mandate that autocommit be off by default is a
strange and unfortunate choice that in my experience leads to a never
ending series of "surprises" such as this one.

My conclusion is that the only sane thing to do is:
1. Only ever create connections in autocommit mode.
2. Only ever use `with connection.transaction()` to control transactions.
3. Forget that `connection.commit()` and `connection.rollback()` exist, and
never use them.

I'm in favour of recommending this as strongly as reasonably possible in
the documentation.

It's a shame that 1 is not the default. So you still have to remember to
not forget to do this explicitly, every time you create a connection.

Dani

In response to

Responses

Browse psycopg by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Reuben Rissler 2021-10-14 00:14:53 Re: psycopg3 transactions
Previous Message Paolo De Stefani 2021-10-13 18:40:07 Re: psycopg3 transactions