From: | Jonathon Lachlan-Haché <jonlachlan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #12228: Primary use-case of PERCENT_RANK not supported |
Date: | 2014-12-15 21:28:14 |
Message-ID: | CAGzkcODnfFzD2gGSH-b91d3BVzsZt8=5awKU4kbwPdRqDfGD+w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Yes, you are right that I just needed the basic window function. I must
have been confused because I was using percentile_disc() and assumed I
would be using the same WITHIN GROUP syntax.
I was not clear before about the hypothetical set functions and their
purpose. I have looked at the documentation at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/functions-aggregate.html and now
see the difference.
Might it be worthwhile to include a suggestion in the error message and/or
documentation "Use of percent_rank() WITHIN GROUP is a hypothetical-set
aggregate function. If you do not intend to use a hypothetical-set
aggregate function, try using a window function with PARTITION BY instead
of WITHIN GROUP"? Not sure if that aligns with your style guidelines, but
just a thought.
Thanks so much for your previous response,
Jon
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-12-16 01:15:38 | Re: BUG #12242: No error - if there is no comma seperator |
Previous Message | Andrew Sackville-West | 2014-12-15 20:06:40 | Re: regression, deadlock in high frequency single-row UPDATE |