Re: WAL Consistency checking for hash indexes

From: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL Consistency checking for hash indexes
Date: 2017-03-15 05:57:10
Message-ID: CAGz5QCLABqtsnJNQPq5rVDwn3P0ojb9ah0p5SXkmYnzuErhyLg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Couple of review comments,,
>>
>> You may also need to update the documentation as now we are also going
>> to support wal consistency check for hash index. The current
>> documentation does not include hash index.
>>
>> + only records originating from those resource managers. Currently,
>> + the supported resource managers are <literal>heap</>,
>> + <literal>heap2</>, <literal>btree</>, <literal>gin</>,
>> + <literal>gist</>, <literal>sequence</>, <literal>spgist</>,
>> + <literal>brin</>, and <literal>generic</>. Only
>
> Did that, committed this. Also ran pgindent over hash_mask() and
> fixed an instance of dubious capitalization.
Thanks Robert for the commit.

--
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-03-15 06:28:03 Re: Backend crash on non-exclusive backup cancel
Previous Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2017-03-15 05:56:22 Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask