From: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: many copies of atooid() and oid_cmp() |
Date: | 2017-01-12 05:25:16 |
Message-ID: | CAGz5QCJqWs1JU7BvCjrv=4WNY+cJ0+1E68ufbG5eykzxQb1TUw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> There are approximately 11 copies of atooid() and 3 of oid_cmp() or
> equivalent, and pending patches are proposing to add more. I propose
> these two patches to collect them in central places.
>
I've verified that the patch covers all the copies of atooid() and
oid_cmp() that should be replaced. However, as Tom suggested, I've
looked into pg_dump and found that there is a oidcmp() as well. It may
have been missed because it has a different name.
I was wondering whether it is worth to replace the following as well:
(TransactionId)strtoul(str, NULL, 16) to something like #define atotranid().
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Borodin | 2017-01-12 05:45:49 | Re: background sessions |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2017-01-12 04:52:11 | Re: Misplacement of function declaration in contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.h |