From: | Tim Uckun <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Geoff Winkless <pgsqlgeneral(at)geoff(dot)dj> |
Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Upsert Functionality using CTEs |
Date: | 2013-02-11 11:08:31 |
Message-ID: | CAGuHJrOkyi=VZwD_rqzSUGagNxgT4FQcE3=uv2yt=TahdA2CnQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
>
>
> I read it that he has multiple sales from the same person? In which case
> pretending that the two sales were from different people isn't the correct
> result at all.
Actually it turns out that both cases exist.
>
> I may be missing the point of the query, but wasn't it to add an entry for
> each email address and (if it already exists in people) to update the
> firstname field to match the firstname in the order?
Yes. Basically the sales table is denormalized and I need to create or
update normalized tables from it. As you have pointed out the
difficult scenario is when the same person has multiple sales.
> Given that the results will be returned in random order I would just change
> the "nd" query to SELECT DISTINCT ON (email) , but like I said I may be
> missing the point.
I think in this case I am probably going to have go through the
records one at a time. I run into the same issues with other columns
such as products.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2013-02-11 14:03:58 | fascinating article on postgresql mailing lists |
Previous Message | Geoff Winkless | 2013-02-11 10:45:48 | Re: Upsert Functionality using CTEs |