From: | Tim Uckun <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sameer Kumar <sameer(dot)kumar(at)ashnik(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres seems to use indexes in the wrong order |
Date: | 2015-01-27 10:23:32 |
Message-ID: | CAGuHJrMUh3+FOypWjb3zG21NDMw4G74A4OG1GiRzWJ+1AqpbtA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks for the tips. I'll make some adjustments
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Sameer Kumar <sameer(dot)kumar(at)ashnik(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Tim Uckun <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> The query seems to first use the timestamp column which results in a huge
>> number of records and then filters out using the integer and the macaddr
>> indices. If it was to use the integer index first it would start with a
>> tiny number of records.
>>
>
> May be the record distribution of quantiles is skewed. Have you tried to
> set more granular statistics for your int column?
>
> The effective_cache_size is one gig. The others are not set so therefore
>> the default.
>
>
> Ideally the effective_cache_size can be set to as much as 50-60% of your
> available memory. Also you need to tune your random_page_cost as per the
> behavior of your disk.
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server
>
> If these two does not work then may be you should go for setting a more
> granular statistics collection for your specific column-
>
> alter table <table_name> alter column <column_Name> set statistics 1000;
> analyze <table_name>;
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> *Sameer Kumar | Database Consultant*
>
> *ASHNIK PTE. LTD.*
>
> 101 Cecil Street, #11-11 Tong Eng Building, Singapore 069533
>
> M: *+65 8110 0350 <%2B65%208110%200350>* T: +65 6438 3504 |
> www.ashnik.com
>
> *[image: icons]*
>
>
>
> [image: Email patch] <http://www.ashnik.com/>
>
>
>
> This email may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material and
> is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s).
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Dizon | 2015-01-27 10:46:13 | |
Previous Message | Christian Paminger | 2015-01-27 09:19:41 | Re: multiple parameters to an AGGREGATE function |