From: | Tim Uckun <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Running update in chunks? |
Date: | 2013-01-25 09:00:15 |
Message-ID: | CAGuHJrM6v9=1BhjRGTL-7jUyXKLAdWVj9YVb=xmQfnV4Q3HNGg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
relid | 26710
schemaname | cars
relname | imports
seq_scan | 280
seq_tup_read | 25873543
idx_scan | 4
idx_tup_fetch | 2749
n_tup_ins | 98926
n_tup_upd | 6350466
n_tup_del | 92
n_tup_hot_upd | 625286
n_live_tup | 98834
n_dead_tup | 0
last_vacuum | 2013-01-25 21:55:36.078614+13
last_autovacuum | 2013-01-25 21:58:40.850546+13
last_analyze | 2013-01-25 21:55:36.305967+13
last_autoanalyze | 2013-01-25 21:51:54.307639+13
vacuum_count | 6
autovacuum_count | 32
analyze_count | 6
autoanalyze_count | 25
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Steve Crawford
<scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> wrote:
> On 01/21/2013 05:02 PM, Tim Uckun wrote:
>>
>> I already posted the schema earlier. It's a handful of integer fields
>> with one hstore field.
>
>
> Oh well. I can't find it but maybe it got lost in shipping or eaten by a
> spam filter.
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Steve Crawford
>> <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> select * from pg_stat_user_tables where relname='yourtable';
>>
>>
>>
>> Messy output
>
> Don't know if you are in psql but if so, expanded display works for this.
> I.e.:
> steve(at)[local] => \x
> Expanded display is on.
> steve(at)[local] => select * from pg_stat_user_tables where relname='footest';
> -[ RECORD 1 ]-----+------------------------------
> relid | 781691
> schemaname | public
> relname | footest
> seq_scan | 3
> seq_tup_read | 609
> idx_scan |
> idx_tup_fetch |
> n_tup_ins | 609
> n_tup_upd | 0
> n_tup_del | 0
> n_tup_hot_upd | 0
> n_live_tup | 301
> n_dead_tup | 0
> last_vacuum |
> last_autovacuum |
> last_analyze |
> last_autoanalyze | 2012-12-19 08:42:23.347368-08
> vacuum_count | 0
> autovacuum_count | 0
> analyze_count | 0
> autoanalyze_count | 2
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> "relid","schemaname","relname","seq_scan","seq_tup_read","idx_scan","idx_tup_fetch","n_tup_ins","n_tup_upd","n_tup_del","n_tup_hot_upd","n_live_tup","n_dead_tup","last_vacuum","last_autovacuum","last_analyze","last_autoanalyze","vacuum_count","autovacuum_count","analyze_count","autoanalyze_count"
>>
>> 26710,"chrysler","imports",274,25280539,4,2749,98926,5757462,92,327542,98834,0,"2013-01-22
>> 12:28:29.01505+13","2013-01-22 12:32:29.249588+13","2013-01-22
>> 12:28:29.173772+13","2013-01-22 12:32:44.123493+13",3,30,3,24
>>
>>
> So at least autovacuum is running (and some manual vacuum and analyze as
> well).
>
> Cheers,
> Steve
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tim Uckun | 2013-01-25 09:02:59 | Re: Running update in chunks? |
Previous Message | Tim Uckun | 2013-01-25 08:57:31 | Re: Running update in chunks? |