Re: Is PL-PGSQL interpreted or complied?

From:	Tim Uckun <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:	Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Is PL-PGSQL interpreted or complied?
Date:	2017-07-06 09:32:00
Message-ID:	CAGuHJrM6kqpoqoUBxGU200NQP1zaD=r6CaP2r=BDS0NhHFPvbw@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2017-07-06 00:10:01 from Tim Uckun <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com>  2017-07-06 00:58:08 from John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>  2017-07-06 04:55:57 from Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>   2017-07-06 09:32:00 from Tim Uckun <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-general

In response to

• Re: Is PL-PGSQL interpreted or complied? at 2017-07-06 04:55:57 from Pavel Stehule

Browse pgsql-general by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Steve DeLong	2017-07-06 14:44:15	Trying to reduce xlog wal files
Previous Message	Yong Zhang	2017-07-06 08:10:53	pg_rewind could not find previous WAL record at 0/4B000060: invalid record length at 0/4B000060: wanted 24, got 0